The Aquarian Age. As we plunge head first into the new technological age it is becoming crystal clear that those of us who wish to remain grounded in our bare human biology and the God given rights stemming from natural law must become steadfast in the boundaries we draw around ourselves and our families. As medical technologies develop and become second nature, organic human beings will become the new minority class. The time is at hand in which choosing to decline medical interventions is met with social pressure, persecution, and sooner than later, prosecution. We’ve already seen the spirits testing the waters as to how far society will allow the exclusion and persecution of unaltered humans and the question must be broached, are we allowed to be fully human in an increasingly techno-fascist society?
There are no human rights if there are no humans. Now more than ever it is essential that we retain the right to decline artificial interventions in the human processes of healing, reproduction, and death and that the right to accept or decline the aid of the medical establishment remain in the hands of individuals, or in this case, mothers. Preconception, pregnancy, birth, and mothering choices must remain a private enterprise between women and their creator. The right to be human and have human experiences, as raw and painful as they may be, must be preserved. Those who wish to honor God as the highest authority of life, not the medical or governing elite class, should steel themselves to do so going forward.
The Watchwomen. The medicalization of reproduction and women’s healthcare has birthed a resistance of women who have clarity on the brilliance of their biological design. These women see through the forces which wish to muddy and erase intelligently designed reproduction in order to co-opt, control, and ultimately diminish humanity and life itself. One term that you will hear to describe these women is birth keeper. Brooke Collier describes the term this way on her blog:
From the best of my ability to track down its origins, the term Birth Keeper was coined by Jeannine Parvati Baker, a midwife and herbalist who practiced in the 1970s. She was making a parallelism with the term Earth Keeper, an eco-activist who would protect the Earth. Similarly, a Birth Keeper is a birth activist who protects birth.
As traditional midwifery has been increasingly swallowed up by medical protocols, and regulated, licensed, and integrated with the medical-industrial complex, birth workers who don’t align with this new expression of midwifery and appropriation of the word midwife have been groping around in search of a title that will clearly delineate them from that form of it.
The activist spirit behind the term remains. I have noticed that self described birth keepers tend to either be borderline Gaia worshiping witches or fringe christian birth workers. Either way, birth keepers, or women who are dedicated to the stewardship and preservation of the physiological design for reproduction and birth, though they vary ideologically, are united in their mission to guard ORIGINAL DESIGN HUMAN FEMALE REPRODUCTION which must be protected from the encroaching pharmacological, transhumanist, technocracy which aims to replace original design human female reproduction with a SYNTHETIC TECHNOLOGICAL MONOPOLY over human reproductive capacity. Autonomous preconception, pregnancy, and birth outside of the medical-industrial complex has become the ultimate women's resistance against the encroachment of these powers and the life-long influence they exert over women and babies.
Ideologically I align with the term birth keeper more than doula. Doulas are birth professionals who are trained to serve and support birthing women without expressing their informed concerns on the treatment of their clients birthing in the system. This leaves some doulas feeling as though they are muzzled and complicit in the medical abuse of women and babies. While both doulas and birth keepers are educated in best natural and medical birth practices, birth keepers don’t pretend to be unbiased and tend to only support women who are aiming to birth physiologically, which places both parties in the best position for favorable mental, emotional, and physical outcomes. The strategically traumatized masses are still completely bewildered by the 1% of women who choose home birth and midwives, doulas, and birth keepers to support them but in the wake of recent medical negligence and coercion many are realizing that hospitals are not as safe as they thought and the “fads” of ancient, mammalian, physiological, autonomous birth, and herbalism are being resurrected once more.
For those who do not identify as midwives, doulas, or birth keepers, like myself, I invite you to be watchwomen at the gates of life and blow the trumpet on the transhumanist erasure of women, babies, and humanity.
But if the watchman sees the sword coming and does not blow the trumpet, and the people are not warned, and the sword comes and takes any person from among them, he is taken away in his iniquity; but his blood I will require at the watchman’s hand.’ “So you, son of man: I have made you a watchman for the house of Israel; therefore you shall hear a word from My mouth and warn them for Me.
Ezekiel 33:6-7
Transhumanism, human deconstruction, and the erasure of men, women, and babies in culture looks like:
Hookup Culture, Pornography, Prostitution, & Sexual Trauma ——> promotes distrust, enmity, and de-partnering between the sexes, the buying and selling of women, their dehumanization and misappropriation, normalizes and commodifies the sacrilegious violation of women, diminishes women psychologically as orifices and things to be used which leads to disassociation from their bodies and the subsequent impulses to escape from womanhood via substance abuse, self harm, suicide, lesbianism, or gender transition
Abortion —> the medical erasure of children
Birth Control —> the pharmaceutical castration of women
Pharmaceutical Management and "Augmentation" of Birth —> the pharmacological control and management of female biological processes
Reproductive Newspeak —> terms like bleeder, chest feeder, and birthing person erase women and subsequently the appropriate consideration of their unique biological needs
Artificial Insemination —> the removal of love and men from reproduction, the dismissal of root causes for infertility, and the de-partnering of men and women
Surrogacy —> the buying and selling of women, wombs, and children, and the erasure of mothers
The Trans Agenda, Cross Sex Hormone, and Surgery Industry —> the experimental and unnatural hormonal experimentation and mutilation of humans and a rebranding of mass disassociation/dysmorphia/disembodiment, self harm, sterilization, and eugenics
Artificial Womb Facilities —> the future commercialization of life, selling of children, and female erasure
The term transhumanism was coined by Julian Huxley, the brother of the novelist Aldous Huxley and the first director-general of the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO). In an essay entitled “Transhumanism,” published in the book New Bottles for New Wine (1957), Huxley defined transhumanism as the self-transcendence of humanity:
The human species can, if it wishes, transcend itself—not just sporadically, an individual here in one way, an individual there in another way, but in its entirety, as humanity. We need a name for this new belief. Perhaps transhumanism will serve: man remaining man, but transcending himself, by realizing new possibilities of and for his human nature.
One question for transhumanism is indeed whether this transcendence will apply to the whole human species or rather for only a select part of it. But Huxley gave some indication of how this human self-transcendence might occur: humanity would become “managing director of the biggest business of all, the business of evolution . . .” As the first epigraph to this Part makes clear, Julian Huxley was a proponent of eugenics. And he was the President of the British Eugenics Society. It was in his introduction of UNESCO, as the director-general that he suggested that eugenics, after the Nazi regime had given it such a bad name, should be rescued from opprobrium, “so that much that now is unthinkable may at least become thinkable.”
Transhuman ideology is inherently anti-human/anti-life and sits comfortably alongside:
The Green Agenda & Climate Change Activists —> Who worship the earth and despise the human virus which harms her. You are the carbon they want to reduce.
Antinatalists —> Who believe procreators are selfish and must be discouraged.
Overpopulation Evangelists —> Who promote smart cities aka concentration camps, birth control, abortion, and same sex relationships as a means of saving mother earth.
& Eugenicists —> Elitist depopulationists who work to massively reduce the human population worldwide, preserving only enough plebeians to serve them.
For Huxley and elitists like him transhumanism is about transcending humans. It’s about an evolutionary progression in which humans become obsolete and something better takes their place. The rhetoric of “women’s rights”, “her body her choice”, “gay rights”, “trans rights”, while sounding good and compassionate are emotionally manipulative branding slogans crafted and dispersed by the ruling elite to cull the herd and dupe the naive among us to champion the end of their bloodlines - effectively doing their dirty work for them. They have found that pharmaceutical warfare is far more subtle and profitable for achieving their ends.
But he who sins against me wrongs his own soul;
All those who hate me love death.
Proverbs 8:36
I will not be surprised if in coming years procreation between men and women and the resulting family unit is deemed hetero normative, bio-essentialist, uninclusive, white supremacist, and too carbon expensive. In the transhuman world order, what’s left of humans will be divorced from their creator, men will be divorced from women, and women will be divorced from their children. The chemical and pharmaceutical assault we have been under as humans will have effectively sterilized the populace. Reproduction will be artificially monopolized by the state or corporations which grow their own patented citizens who call the the state their father, their mother, and their big brother. I don’t know how far we are from this dystopia, could be five years or fifty, what I do know is that the ideologies and actions taking place today are the beginning of what I’ve described. An all out war on the creator and the biology and divine callings of his creations.
As always I have to put a disclaimer. I am not here to judge any woman or her choices and that, of course, she should make whatever medical choices she feels most comfortable with. My perspective is always that of a birds eye view in the spirit and not one involved in the intricacies of the choices of individuals. Medical advances have to this point been a net good but I see the tides beginning to turn. We stand at an interim where organic humans and those which hold to their religious convictions may still partake in society and access public services. My question is… how long will it be before humans have to go the way of corn to receive healthcare? It may be wise to start mentally preparing for a time when access to medical services is reserved for those who have joined the fold. Hope is abundant when contemplating the future because, at least as far as birth is concerned, no priests of medicine or pharmaceuticals are necessary to birth. The human blueprint for birth is as inherent as the procreative act itself.
Soooooo much resonance Here. I feel your passion palpably. God Bless 🤍🤲🏼
Sooo well written I deeply enjoyed reading the way you outline things. Full sanity. I look forward to reading more of your stuff !